With the announcement of the April 24 release date for the long anticipated Apple Watch (http://www.cnet.com/products/apple-watch/), this is a good time for employers to consider the topic of wearable technology.
Yet Another Reason to Read the Fine Print: Allied Industrial Scrap, Inc. v. Omnisource, Corp. (6th Cir. 2015)
Late television curmudgeon Andy Rooney is said to have observed that “nothing in fine print is good news.” Based on a recent decision from the Sixth Circuit, the fine print can be good news for some, and costly for others.
New Rules for Federal Contractors:
On December 3, 2014, the Department of Labor announced a Final Rule changing OFCCP’s regulations so that they prohibit discrimination based on, and require treatment of applicants and employees without regard to, sexual orientation or gender identity. These final rules were issued as a result of President Obama signing an executive order in July, 2014, extending workplace protections to lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) Americans in the federal contracting workforce.
Legal Alert: NLRB Holds Employees May Use Employer Email Systems for Non-Work-Related Communications
In a reversal of precedent, a divided National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) held yesterday that employees have a right to use their employers’ email systems for non-business purposes, including statutorily protected communications regarding the terms and conditions of their employment and regarding union organizing efforts. See Purple Communications, Inc., 361 NLRB No. 126 (December 11, 2014). The NLRB’s ruling stemmed from a case brought by the Communications Workers of America union after it unsuccessfully attempted to organize employees of Purple Communications, Inc., a company that provides interpreting services for the deaf and hearing-impaired. The union argued that prohibiting the company’s workers from using the company’s email system for non-business purposes and on behalf of organizations not associated with the company interfered with the CWA’s organizing efforts.
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court issued a highly-anticipated ruling in the case of Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. Busk, No. 13-433 (Dec. 9, 2014, Thomas, C.).
This Wednesday, December 3, 2014, the United States Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the case of Young v. UPS, No. 12-1226, on appeal from the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal. The Young case has received significant attention because it asks the Court to directly address the question of what, if any, accommodation is required for a pregnant worker with work limitations under the Pregnancy Discrimination Act, incorporated into Title VII of the Civil Rights Act in 1978, where the employer provides work accommodations to non-pregnant employees with work limitations, such as those affected by on-the-job injuries or a disability as defined by the Americans with Disabilities Act.
The U.S. Department of Labor's Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”) issued a final rule on September 11, 2014, requiring employers to notify OSHA when an employee is killed on the job or suffers a work-related hospitalization, amputation or loss of an eye. The rule will go into effect on Jan. 1, 2015. The rule also updates the list of employers partially exempt from OSHA’s recordkeeping requirements.
The recently-published video of NFL star-running back Ray Rice beating his then-fiancée in a casino elevator begs the question: What should an employer do when it faces bad behavior by one of its employees? And, does it matter if the employee is off-the-clock?
Companies with Kentucky employees need to review their non-competition agreements.
Two federal courts recently dealt with thorny issues stemming from defendant employers’ use of the attorney-client privilege and work product doctrine. These rulings should be heeded by those of us who develop or revise electronic data review protocols, particularly any guidance for determining when to withhold documents under the attorney-client privilege or the work product doctrine.
KMK's Management Rights Blog will focus on labor and employment law issues, developments, and musings. We will cover issues and developments in our home state of Ohio and beyond. We are management side lawyers and this blog will focus on the management perspective, which is often ignored or misrepresented in main stream press reporting of labor and employment law developments.
Your participation in the blog through suggestions, requests, comments and criticisms is welcomed. We will try to respond to any emails we receive, time permitting. If we refer to comments we receive in future posts, we will not attribute them without permission.
- Electronically Stored Information
- Business Process Improvement
- Affirmative Action
- Department of Labor
- Equal Opportunity Clause
- Security Screening
- Split of Authority
- Supreme Court
- Anti-Theft Screening
- Compensable Time
- Pregnancy Discrimination
- Pregnancy Discrimination Act
- Title VII
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- E-Discovery Case Law
- Electronic Data Discovery
- Rule 26
- Rule 34
- Gender Identity Discrimination
- Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- Employment Settlement Agreements
- Unemployment Insurance Integrity Act
- Employment Litigation
- Disability Law
- Judge Beckwith
- Reasonable Accommodation
- Return to Work
- Seniority Rights
- Attendance Policy
- Sixth Circuit
- American Medical Association
- Class Action Litigation
- Wage Increase
- State Minimum Wage
- Posting Requirements
- Job Description
- Federal Minimum Wage
- Fair Minimum Wage
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- Media Policy
- Employer Rules
- Employer Policies
- Employer Handbook
- National Labor Relations Board
- 2012 Charge Statistics
- Disability Discrimination
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Equal Pay
- Genetic Information Discrimination
- National Origin Discrimination
- Race Discrimination
- Religion Discrimination
- Privacy Laws
- Social Media Content
- Social Networking Sites
- Disability Leave
- Family and Medical Leave Act
- Labor Law
- Environmental Law
- Sexual Harassment
- National Labor Relations Act
- Employment Law
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
- Healthcare Reform
- Social Media
- Workplace Violence
- Wage & Hour
- Collective Action
- Labor & Employment Law
- L&E Movie Reviews
- Wearable Technology – Should Employers Be Concerned?
- Yet Another Reason to Read the Fine Print: Allied Industrial Scrap, Inc. v. Omnisource, Corp. (6th Cir. 2015)
- Gender Indentity Requirements for Federal Contractors
- Legal Alert: NLRB Holds Employees May Use Employer Email Systems for Non-Work-Related Communications
- Supreme Court Finds Post-Shift Security Check Time Not Compensable
- CASE TO WATCH: YOUNG V. UPS
- OSHA Issues New Reporting and Recordkeeping Regulations
- Employees Behaving Badly: What’s An Employer To Do?
- Kentucky Non-Competition Agreements
- Use and Abuse of Attorney-Client Privilege and Work Product Doctrine in E-Discovery