Supreme Court Considers Class Arbitration
The United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments on Wednesday (12/9) in Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. AnimalFeeds International Corp., an anti-trust case. The case is of interest to employment law practitioners because the issue under consideration is whether class arbitration may be imposed when that issue is not addressed in the parties’ arbitration clauses.
CONTACT:
Mark J. Chumley
Topics
- Labor Law
- ADAAA
- Environmental Law
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- Sexual Harassment
- National Labor Relations Act
- Employment Law
- Privacy
- Taxation
- Non-compete/Non-solicit
- FMLA
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
- Healthcare Reform
- Benefits
- Social Media
- Technology
- Guns
- Workplace Violence
- Unions
- Arbitration
- Wage & Hour
- Litigation
- Collective Action
- Harassment
- Labor & Employment Law
- L&E Movie Reviews
Contributors
Subscribe to RSS
Recent Posts
- Fair Employment Opportunity Act and New NLRA Posting Rule
- EEOC Ordered to Pay Millions in Attorneys’ Fees Again
- Work-Life Balance Not Required By Law and Other Interesting Reading
- Employers Win As Supreme Court Says No To Wal-Mart Class Action
- Have You Read Your Job Postings?
- Ohio Judge Thwarts EEOC Effort To Expand Pattern and Practice Lawsuits
- NLRB Files Two More Facebook Cases
- Reimbursing Employees for Travel During the Workday
- Following Up on Past Blog Posts: Cat's Paw, Twitter and Bedbugs
- Why Does the EEOC Need To Solicit Claimants with Radio Announcements?