Let me begin by refusing to apologize for what I’m about to type — Robocop is a great movie. It is violent and vulgar at several points but not so much so by today’s standards. It is set in a future version of Detroit in which crime is rampant and the city is seeking the assistance of a private corporation to provide robotic police officers. After a policeman is gunned down by a drug gang and left for dead, he is transformed by the corporation into a half man, half machine peace officer – the titular Robocop. Guided by three programmed directives (1. Serve the public trust; 2. Protect the innocent; and 3. Uphold the law) and armed with an exceptionally large handgun, he makes short work of violent criminals and causes the rest of the police force to worry about job security. Of course, all is not well. Robocop begins to recall his prior human existence and there is the matter of his secret fourth directive.
You’ve probably seen at least some of Robocop as it is often rerun on cable networks. Perhaps you were too distracted by the shiny mechanical man and the dystopian future to notice that not one but two critical plot points involve labor and employment law issues. First, a police strike sends the city into chaos. There is not much in the plot to analyze from a legal standpoint. Generally, strikes by public employees are illegal in Michigan but that does not mean they cannot happen, particularly in a grim dystopian future.
The more important employment law moment occurs in the climatic final scene of the film and involves the termination of the employment of one of the film’s main characters. In Michigan, employees are presumed to be “at will,” meaning that they may be terminated for any reason, so long as it is not illegal. Some may quibble that the character in question would likely have had an employment agreement with a clause governing termination but there is no evidence of this in the film and, therefore, the presumption of at-will employment must stand. Thus, the film is not only entertaining but accurate in its depiction of labor and employment law.
Labor Law Content **** (out of five)
Labor Law Accuracy ***** (out of five)
- Partner
Mark Chumley has experience representing clients in all aspects of labor and employment law. He has handled numerous cases before state and federal courts and state and federal civil rights agencies, including claims involving ...
Topics/Tags
Select- Labor & Employment Law
- Labor Law
- Coronavirus
- Employment Law
- Wage & Hour
- Privacy
- National Labor Relations Board
- Department of Labor
- Reasonable Accommodation
- Workplace Accommodations
- NLRB
- FMLA
- Medical Marijuana
- Employment Litigation
- Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation
- Religion Discrimination
- Arbitration
- Workplace Violence
- Discrimination
- Pregnancy Discrimination
- Medical Cannabis Dispensaries
- IRS
- Whistleblower
- Litigation
- Disability Discrimination
- Employer Policies
- Social Media
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- United States Supreme Court
- Federal Trade Commission
- Retirement
- Race Discrimination
- OSHA
- Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- National Labor Relations Act
- Accommodation
- ERISA
- Employer Handbook
- EEOC
- ADAAA
- ACA
- Affordable Car Act
- Unions
- Title VII
- Employer Rules
- Sexual Harassment
- Technology
- Federal Arbitration Act
- NLRA
- Transgender Issues
- 401(k)
- Disability
- Employment Settlement Agreements
- Sixth Circuit
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Paycheck Protection Program
- Securities Law
- Benefits
- Gender Identity Discrimination
- Posting Requirements
- Class Action Litigation
- Disability Law
- Preventive Care Benefits
- Health Savings Account
- E-Discovery
- Evidence
- SECURE Act
- US Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration
- Environmental Law
- Family and Medical Leave Act
- Privacy Laws
- Overtime Pay
- Representative Election Regulations
- Department of Justice
- Healthcare Reform
- Older Workers' Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA)
- Telecommuting
- Affirmative Action
- Electronically Stored Information
- Equal Opportunity Clause
- Compensable Time
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- Security Screening
- Supreme Court
- E-Discovery Case Law
- Electronic Data Discovery
- ESI
- Attendance Policy
- Return to Work
- Seniority Rights
- Unemployment Insurance Integrity Act
- American Medical Association
- Classification
- Confidentiality
- Disability Leave
- Equal Pay
- Fair Minimum Wage
- Federal Minimum Wage
- Genetic Information Discrimination
- Media Policy
- Misclassification
- National Origin Discrimination
- Retaliation
- Social Media Content
- State Minimum Wage
- Wage Increase
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
- Taxation
- Antitrust
Recent Posts
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: Immediate Termination
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: Labor & Employment Law Update February 2024
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: Telephone Game
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: Labor & Employment Law Update January 2024
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: Employment Law Issues to Watch in 2024
- Department of Labor Announces New Independent Contractor Rule to Go into Effect March 11, 2024
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: The Employment Law Naughty & Nice List
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: Reefer Madness
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: The Office Romance Episode
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: New Laws Protecting Pregnant and Nursing Workers